The first mention of slavery in the statutes of the English colonies of North America does not occur until after 1660—some forty years after the importation of the first Black people. Lest we think that slavery existed in fact before it did in law, Oscar and Mary Handlin assure us that the status of Black people down to the 1660's was that of servants. A critique of the Handlins' interpretation of why legal slavery did not appear until the 1660's suggests that assumptions about the relation between slavery and racial prejudice should be reexamined, and that explanations for the different treatment of Black slaves in North and South America should be expanded.
The Handlins explain the appearance of legal slavery by arguing that, during the 1660's, the position of White servants was improving relative to that of Black servants. Thus, the Handlins contend, Black and White servants, heretofore treated Mike, each attained a different status. There are, however, important objections to this argument. First, the Handlins cannot adequately demonstrate that the White servant's position was improving during and after the 1660's; several acts of the Maryland and Virginia legislatures indicate otherwise. Another flaw in the Handlins' interpretation is their assumption that prior to the establishment of legal slavery there was no discrimination against Black people. It is true that before the 1660's Black people were rarely called slaves. But this should not overshadow evidence from the 1630's on that point to racial discrimination without using the term slavery. Such discrimination sometimes stopped short of lifetime servitude or inherited status—the two attributes of true slavery, yet in other cases it included both. The Handlins' argument excludes the real possibility that Black people in the English colonies were never treated as the equals of White people.
The possibility has important ramifications. If from the outset Black people were discriminated against, then legal slavery should be viewed as a reflection and an extension of racial prejudice rather than, as many historians including the Handlins have argued, the cause of prejudice. In addition, the existence of discrimination before the advent of legal slavery offers a further explanation for the harsher treatment of Black slaves in North than in South America. Freyre and Tannenbaum have rightly argued that the lack of certain traditions in North America—such as a Roman conception of slavery and a Roman Catholic emphasis on equality—explains why the treatment of Black slaves was more severe there than in the Spanish and Portuguese colonies of South America, But this cannot be the whole explanation since it is merely negative, based only on a lack of something. A more compelling explanation is that the early and sometimes extreme racial discrimination in the English colonies helped determine the particular nature of the slavery that followed.
The effects of 'several acts of the Maryland and Virginia legislatures' passed during and after the 1660's were that they

A.
B.
C.
The
D.negatively
E.
B.had
F.
C.at
G.
D.at
H.

参考答案:C
解析:推理判断题。本文第二段第四句指出'首先,汉德林夫妇不能充分证明:在17世纪60年代以来,白人仆人的地位正在改善。马里兰州和弗吉尼亚州立法机关的法令表明,情况并非那样'。因此可以推论17世纪60年代及之后马里兰州和弗吉尼亚州通过的法律至少使得白人仆人的社会地位并不比17世纪60年代以前更好。
查答案就用赞题库小程序 还有拍照搜题 语音搜题 快来试试吧
无需下载 立即使用

你可能喜欢

单项选择题

A、承保范围广
B、保险危险大
C、一年期保险
D、险种有交叉

判断题

财务内部收益率是指净现值等于零时对应的折现率。()

参考答案:

A. 经济上是否可行
B. 技术上是否可行
C. 组织上是否可行
D. 时间上是否可行
E. 工作上是否可行
此题为多项选择题。

判断题

经济增长通常用国民生产总值作为衡量标准,另一个指标则是人均实际国民生产总值。()

参考答案:
赞题库

赞题库-搜题找答案

(已有500万+用户使用)


  • 历年真题

  • 章节练习

  • 每日一练

  • 高频考题

  • 错题收藏

  • 在线模考

  • 提分密卷

  • 模拟试题

无需下载 立即使用

版权所有©考试资料网(ppkao.com)All Rights Reserved