问答题

听力原文：M: ABP In-House Training, Mike speaking. Good morning.
F: Good morning, Mike. This is Kim here, from Human Resources. We've got someone new starting in the Accounts Department and I'd like to book her on the course on financial statements. Is there a place for her on the next course?
M: Well, it depends. We actually run two courses, one for beginners, and there's also an advanced course, but she'll have to be a qualified accountant to go on that.
F: Yes, she'll actually need the advanced one.
M: OK, that should be all right. Can you give me her name, please?
F: Amy Choi.
M: And her job title?
F: Junior accountant.
M: Now, we'd like to consult with her line managers to ensure that the courses meet staff needs. Who is her line manager?
F: Mr. Lim, he's the Accounts Manager.
M: OK, then. I think that's all I need for now. I'll send you confirmation of this hooking and the dates in the internal mail.
F: That's very helpful. Thank you very much. Good-bye.
F: Good-bye.
?Look at the form. below.
?You will hear a staff development officer booking a new member of staff on an in-house training course.
ABP IN-HOUSE TRAINING: COURSE BOOKINGS
Course (9)___
Level (10)_
Name: Ms Amy Choi
Position/job (11)_
Name of Line Manage: Mr Lim
Position/job of Line Manager(12)___

A.
F:
B.
F:
C.
M:
D.
M:
E.
M:
F.
M:
G.
F:
H.
F:
I.
?Look
J.
?You
K.
ABP

你可能感兴趣的试题

Wild Herds May Stampede Across Britain

A.
B
B.
C
C.
D
D.
F
E.
G

Here, then, is the problem which I present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable; Shall we put an end to the human race or shall mankind renounce war? People will not face this alternative because it is so difficult to abolish war. The abolition of war will demand distasteful limitations of national sovereignty. But what perhaps impedes understanding of the situation more than anything else is that the term 'mankind' feels vague and abstract. People scarcely realize in imagination that the danger is to themselves and their children and their grandchildren, and not only to a dimly apprehended humanity. And so they hope that perhaps war may be allowed to continue provided modern weapons are prohibited. I am afraid this hope is illusory. Whatever agreements not to use hydrogen bombs had been reached in time of peace, they would no longer be considered binding in time of war, and both sides would set to work to manufacture hydrogen bombs as soon as war broke out, for if one side manufactured the bombs and the other did not, the side that manufactured them would inevitably be victorious...