单项选择题

An Asian engineer is assigned to a US laboratory and almost suffers a nervous breakdown US executive dissension(纷争). A Japanese manager is promoted by his British president, but within six months asks for a transfer. Each of these real-life cases involved people who were regarded as superior employees, but were ill-equipped to cope with the complexities and dangers of intercultural management. "Multinational companies have studied everything else, now they’’re finally looking at culture," says Clifford Clarke, founder and president of the California-based IRI International Inc, one of a small but growing number of consulting firms that specialize in teaching business people from differing cultures how to communicate and work with each other. "Never show the shoe to an Arab, never arrive on time for a party in Brazil, and in Japan, don’’t think ’’yes’’ means ’’yes’’," advise US. consultants Lennie Copland and Lewis Brown Griggs, who have produced a series of films and a book to help managers improve their international business skills. But simply learning the social "dos" and "don’’ts" is not the answer, ac cording to the new culture specialist’’s. The penalties for ignoring different thinking patterns, they point out, can be disastrous. For example, the American manager who promised to be fair thought he was telling his Japanese staff that their hard work would be rewarded, but when some workers received higher salary increases than others, there were complaints. "You told us you’’d be fair, and you lied to us," accused one salesman. "It took me a year and a half", sighed the American, "to realize that ’’fair’’, to my staff, meant being treated equally." The Asian engineer who suffered in America was the victim of another mistaken expectation. "He was accustomed to the warm group environment so typical in Japan," said his U. S. manager. "But in our company, we’’re all expected to be self-starters, who thrive on working a lone. For him, it was emotional starvation. He’’s made the adjustment now, but he’’d be humiliated if I told you his name, That’’s another cultural difference." The Japanese manager who failed to respond to his promotion couldn’’t bring himself to use the more direct language needed to communicate with his London-based superiors. "I used to think all this talk about cultural communication was a lot of balcony," says Eugene J. Flath, president of Intel Japan Ltd. ,a subsidiary of the American semiconductor-maker. "Now, I can see it’’s a real problem." Miscommunication has slowed our ability to coordinate action with our office. "That’’s why Intel, with the help of consultant Clarke, began an intercultural training program this spring which Flath expects will dramatically reduce decision-making time now lost in making sure the Americans and the Japanese understand each other. The cultural communication problems are becoming especially urgent for ______.

A.American managers
B.multinational companies
C.Japanese employees
D.consulting firms
题目列表

你可能感兴趣的试题

单项选择题

A controversy erupted in the scientific community in early 1998 over the use of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) fingerprinting in criminal investigations. DNA fingerprinting was introduced in 1987 as a method to identify individuals based on a pattern seen in their DNA, the molecule of which genes are made. DNA is present in every cell of the body except red blood cells. DNA fingerprinting has been used successfully in various ways, such as to determine paternity(父亲的身份)where it is not clear who the father of a particular child is. However, it is in the area of criminal investigations that DNA fingerprinting has potentially powerful and controversial uses. DNA fingerprinting and other DNA analysis techniques have revolutionized criminal investigations by giving investigators powerful new tools in the attempt to prove guilt, not just establish innocence. When used in criminal investigations, a DNA fingerprint pattern from a suspect is compared with a DNA fingerprint pattern obtained from such material as hairs or blood found at the scene of a crime. A match between the two DNA samples can be used as evidence to convict a suspect. The controversy in 1998 stemmed from a report published in December 1991 by population geneticists Richard C. Lewontin of Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass, and Daniel L. Hartl of Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Mo. Lewontin and Hartl called into question the methods to calculate how likely it is that a match between two DNA fingerprints might occur by chance alone. In particular, they argued that the current method can not properly determine the likelihood that two DNA sample will match because they came from the same individual rather than simply from two different individuals who are members of the same ethnic group. Lewontin and Hartl called for better surveys of DNA patterns methods are adequate. In response to their criticisms, population geneticists Ranajit Chakraborty of the University of Texas in Dallas and Kenneth K. Kidd of Yale University in New Haven, Conn., argued that enough data are already available to show that the methods currently being used are adequate. In January 1998. however, the Federal Bureau of investigation and laboratories that conduct DNA tests announced that they would collect additional DNA samples from various ethnic groups in an attempt to resolve some of these questions. And. in April. the National Academy of Sciences called for strict standards and system of accreditation (鉴定合格)for DNA testing laboratories. Before DNA fingerprinting is used, suspects ______.

A.would have to leave their fingerprints for further investigations
B.could easily escape conviction of guilt
C.would have to submit evidence for their innocence
D.could be convicted of guilt as well
单项选择题

A controversy erupted in the scientific community in early 1998 over the use of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) fingerprinting in criminal investigations. DNA fingerprinting was introduced in 1987 as a method to identify individuals based on a pattern seen in their DNA, the molecule of which genes are made. DNA is present in every cell of the body except red blood cells. DNA fingerprinting has been used successfully in various ways, such as to determine paternity(父亲的身份)where it is not clear who the father of a particular child is. However, it is in the area of criminal investigations that DNA fingerprinting has potentially powerful and controversial uses. DNA fingerprinting and other DNA analysis techniques have revolutionized criminal investigations by giving investigators powerful new tools in the attempt to prove guilt, not just establish innocence. When used in criminal investigations, a DNA fingerprint pattern from a suspect is compared with a DNA fingerprint pattern obtained from such material as hairs or blood found at the scene of a crime. A match between the two DNA samples can be used as evidence to convict a suspect. The controversy in 1998 stemmed from a report published in December 1991 by population geneticists Richard C. Lewontin of Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass, and Daniel L. Hartl of Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Mo. Lewontin and Hartl called into question the methods to calculate how likely it is that a match between two DNA fingerprints might occur by chance alone. In particular, they argued that the current method can not properly determine the likelihood that two DNA sample will match because they came from the same individual rather than simply from two different individuals who are members of the same ethnic group. Lewontin and Hartl called for better surveys of DNA patterns methods are adequate. In response to their criticisms, population geneticists Ranajit Chakraborty of the University of Texas in Dallas and Kenneth K. Kidd of Yale University in New Haven, Conn., argued that enough data are already available to show that the methods currently being used are adequate. In January 1998. however, the Federal Bureau of investigation and laboratories that conduct DNA tests announced that they would collect additional DNA samples from various ethnic groups in an attempt to resolve some of these questions. And. in April. the National Academy of Sciences called for strict standards and system of accreditation (鉴定合格)for DNA testing laboratories. According to the passage, DNA fingerprinting can be unreliable when ______.

A.the methods used of blood-cell calculation are not accurate
B.two different individuals of the same ethnic group may have the same DNA fingerprinting pattern
C.a match is by chance left with fingerprints that happen to belong to two different individuals
D.two different individuals leave two DNA samples
单项选择题

A controversy erupted in the scientific community in early 1998 over the use of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) fingerprinting in criminal investigations. DNA fingerprinting was introduced in 1987 as a method to identify individuals based on a pattern seen in their DNA, the molecule of which genes are made. DNA is present in every cell of the body except red blood cells. DNA fingerprinting has been used successfully in various ways, such as to determine paternity(父亲的身份)where it is not clear who the father of a particular child is. However, it is in the area of criminal investigations that DNA fingerprinting has potentially powerful and controversial uses. DNA fingerprinting and other DNA analysis techniques have revolutionized criminal investigations by giving investigators powerful new tools in the attempt to prove guilt, not just establish innocence. When used in criminal investigations, a DNA fingerprint pattern from a suspect is compared with a DNA fingerprint pattern obtained from such material as hairs or blood found at the scene of a crime. A match between the two DNA samples can be used as evidence to convict a suspect. The controversy in 1998 stemmed from a report published in December 1991 by population geneticists Richard C. Lewontin of Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass, and Daniel L. Hartl of Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Mo. Lewontin and Hartl called into question the methods to calculate how likely it is that a match between two DNA fingerprints might occur by chance alone. In particular, they argued that the current method can not properly determine the likelihood that two DNA sample will match because they came from the same individual rather than simply from two different individuals who are members of the same ethnic group. Lewontin and Hartl called for better surveys of DNA patterns methods are adequate. In response to their criticisms, population geneticists Ranajit Chakraborty of the University of Texas in Dallas and Kenneth K. Kidd of Yale University in New Haven, Conn., argued that enough data are already available to show that the methods currently being used are adequate. In January 1998. however, the Federal Bureau of investigation and laboratories that conduct DNA tests announced that they would collect additional DNA samples from various ethnic groups in an attempt to resolve some of these questions. And. in April. the National Academy of Sciences called for strict standards and system of accreditation (鉴定合格)for DNA testing laboratories. To geneticists like Lewontin and Hartl, the current method ______.

A.is not so convincing as to exclude the likelihood that two DNA samples can never come from two individuals
B.is beyond dispute because two individuals of the same ethnic group are likely to have the same DNA pattern
C.is not based on adequate scientific theory of genetics
D.is theoretically contradictory to what they have been studying
单项选择题

An Asian engineer is assigned to a US laboratory and almost suffers a nervous breakdown US executive dissension(纷争). A Japanese manager is promoted by his British president, but within six months asks for a transfer. Each of these real-life cases involved people who were regarded as superior employees, but were ill-equipped to cope with the complexities and dangers of intercultural management. "Multinational companies have studied everything else, now they’’re finally looking at culture," says Clifford Clarke, founder and president of the California-based IRI International Inc, one of a small but growing number of consulting firms that specialize in teaching business people from differing cultures how to communicate and work with each other. "Never show the shoe to an Arab, never arrive on time for a party in Brazil, and in Japan, don’’t think ’’yes’’ means ’’yes’’," advise US. consultants Lennie Copland and Lewis Brown Griggs, who have produced a series of films and a book to help managers improve their international business skills. But simply learning the social "dos" and "don’’ts" is not the answer, ac cording to the new culture specialist’’s. The penalties for ignoring different thinking patterns, they point out, can be disastrous. For example, the American manager who promised to be fair thought he was telling his Japanese staff that their hard work would be rewarded, but when some workers received higher salary increases than others, there were complaints. "You told us you’’d be fair, and you lied to us," accused one salesman. "It took me a year and a half", sighed the American, "to realize that ’’fair’’, to my staff, meant being treated equally." The Asian engineer who suffered in America was the victim of another mistaken expectation. "He was accustomed to the warm group environment so typical in Japan," said his U. S. manager. "But in our company, we’’re all expected to be self-starters, who thrive on working a lone. For him, it was emotional starvation. He’’s made the adjustment now, but he’’d be humiliated if I told you his name, That’’s another cultural difference." The Japanese manager who failed to respond to his promotion couldn’’t bring himself to use the more direct language needed to communicate with his London-based superiors. "I used to think all this talk about cultural communication was a lot of balcony," says Eugene J. Flath, president of Intel Japan Ltd. ,a subsidiary of the American semiconductor-maker. "Now, I can see it’’s a real problem." Miscommunication has slowed our ability to coordinate action with our office. "That’’s why Intel, with the help of consultant Clarke, began an intercultural training program this spring which Flath expects will dramatically reduce decision-making time now lost in making sure the Americans and the Japanese understand each other. The best title for the passage would be ______.

A.Building Bridges over the Cultural Rivers
B.Multinational Training for Businessmen
C.Learning Different Thinking Patterns
D.Communication Problems and Complaints
单项选择题

A controversy erupted in the scientific community in early 1998 over the use of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) fingerprinting in criminal investigations. DNA fingerprinting was introduced in 1987 as a method to identify individuals based on a pattern seen in their DNA, the molecule of which genes are made. DNA is present in every cell of the body except red blood cells. DNA fingerprinting has been used successfully in various ways, such as to determine paternity(父亲的身份)where it is not clear who the father of a particular child is. However, it is in the area of criminal investigations that DNA fingerprinting has potentially powerful and controversial uses. DNA fingerprinting and other DNA analysis techniques have revolutionized criminal investigations by giving investigators powerful new tools in the attempt to prove guilt, not just establish innocence. When used in criminal investigations, a DNA fingerprint pattern from a suspect is compared with a DNA fingerprint pattern obtained from such material as hairs or blood found at the scene of a crime. A match between the two DNA samples can be used as evidence to convict a suspect. The controversy in 1998 stemmed from a report published in December 1991 by population geneticists Richard C. Lewontin of Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass, and Daniel L. Hartl of Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Mo. Lewontin and Hartl called into question the methods to calculate how likely it is that a match between two DNA fingerprints might occur by chance alone. In particular, they argued that the current method can not properly determine the likelihood that two DNA sample will match because they came from the same individual rather than simply from two different individuals who are members of the same ethnic group. Lewontin and Hartl called for better surveys of DNA patterns methods are adequate. In response to their criticisms, population geneticists Ranajit Chakraborty of the University of Texas in Dallas and Kenneth K. Kidd of Yale University in New Haven, Conn., argued that enough data are already available to show that the methods currently being used are adequate. In January 1998. however, the Federal Bureau of investigation and laboratories that conduct DNA tests announced that they would collect additional DNA samples from various ethnic groups in an attempt to resolve some of these questions. And. in April. the National Academy of Sciences called for strict standards and system of accreditation (鉴定合格)for DNA testing laboratories. The attitude of the Federal Bureau of Investigation shows that ______.

A.enough data are yet to be collected from various ethnic groups to confirm the unlikelihood of two DNA samples coming from two individual members
B.enough data of DNA samples should be collected to confirm that only .DNA samples from the same person can match
C.enough data are yet to be collected from various ethnic groups to determine the likelihood of two different DNA samples coming from the same person
D.additional samples from various ethnic groups should be collected to determine that two DNA samples are unlikely to come from the same person
单项选择题

A controversy erupted in the scientific community in early 1998 over the use of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) fingerprinting in criminal investigations. DNA fingerprinting was introduced in 1987 as a method to identify individuals based on a pattern seen in their DNA, the molecule of which genes are made. DNA is present in every cell of the body except red blood cells. DNA fingerprinting has been used successfully in various ways, such as to determine paternity(父亲的身份)where it is not clear who the father of a particular child is. However, it is in the area of criminal investigations that DNA fingerprinting has potentially powerful and controversial uses. DNA fingerprinting and other DNA analysis techniques have revolutionized criminal investigations by giving investigators powerful new tools in the attempt to prove guilt, not just establish innocence. When used in criminal investigations, a DNA fingerprint pattern from a suspect is compared with a DNA fingerprint pattern obtained from such material as hairs or blood found at the scene of a crime. A match between the two DNA samples can be used as evidence to convict a suspect. The controversy in 1998 stemmed from a report published in December 1991 by population geneticists Richard C. Lewontin of Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass, and Daniel L. Hartl of Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Mo. Lewontin and Hartl called into question the methods to calculate how likely it is that a match between two DNA fingerprints might occur by chance alone. In particular, they argued that the current method can not properly determine the likelihood that two DNA sample will match because they came from the same individual rather than simply from two different individuals who are members of the same ethnic group. Lewontin and Hartl called for better surveys of DNA patterns methods are adequate. In response to their criticisms, population geneticists Ranajit Chakraborty of the University of Texas in Dallas and Kenneth K. Kidd of Yale University in New Haven, Conn., argued that enough data are already available to show that the methods currently being used are adequate. In January 1998. however, the Federal Bureau of investigation and laboratories that conduct DNA tests announced that they would collect additional DNA samples from various ethnic groups in an attempt to resolve some of these questions. And. in April. the National Academy of Sciences called for strict standards and system of accreditation (鉴定合格)for DNA testing laboratories. The National Academy of Sciences holds the stance that ______.

A.DNA testing should be systematized
B.only authorized laboratories can conduct DNA testing
C.the academy only is authorized to work out standards for testing
D.the academy has the right to accredit laboratories for DNA testing
单项选择题

An Asian engineer is assigned to a US laboratory and almost suffers a nervous breakdown US executive dissension(纷争). A Japanese manager is promoted by his British president, but within six months asks for a transfer. Each of these real-life cases involved people who were regarded as superior employees, but were ill-equipped to cope with the complexities and dangers of intercultural management. "Multinational companies have studied everything else, now they’’re finally looking at culture," says Clifford Clarke, founder and president of the California-based IRI International Inc, one of a small but growing number of consulting firms that specialize in teaching business people from differing cultures how to communicate and work with each other. "Never show the shoe to an Arab, never arrive on time for a party in Brazil, and in Japan, don’’t think ’’yes’’ means ’’yes’’," advise US. consultants Lennie Copland and Lewis Brown Griggs, who have produced a series of films and a book to help managers improve their international business skills. But simply learning the social "dos" and "don’’ts" is not the answer, ac cording to the new culture specialist’’s. The penalties for ignoring different thinking patterns, they point out, can be disastrous. For example, the American manager who promised to be fair thought he was telling his Japanese staff that their hard work would be rewarded, but when some workers received higher salary increases than others, there were complaints. "You told us you’’d be fair, and you lied to us," accused one salesman. "It took me a year and a half", sighed the American, "to realize that ’’fair’’, to my staff, meant being treated equally." The Asian engineer who suffered in America was the victim of another mistaken expectation. "He was accustomed to the warm group environment so typical in Japan," said his U. S. manager. "But in our company, we’’re all expected to be self-starters, who thrive on working a lone. For him, it was emotional starvation. He’’s made the adjustment now, but he’’d be humiliated if I told you his name, That’’s another cultural difference." The Japanese manager who failed to respond to his promotion couldn’’t bring himself to use the more direct language needed to communicate with his London-based superiors. "I used to think all this talk about cultural communication was a lot of balcony," says Eugene J. Flath, president of Intel Japan Ltd. ,a subsidiary of the American semiconductor-maker. "Now, I can see it’’s a real problem." Miscommunication has slowed our ability to coordinate action with our office. "That’’s why Intel, with the help of consultant Clarke, began an intercultural training program this spring which Flath expects will dramatically reduce decision-making time now lost in making sure the Americans and the Japanese understand each other. The Japanese staff complained to the American manager because ______.

A.the American manager had lied to them
B.the salary increases were insufficient
C.most staff had not received salary increases
D.there was a misunderstanding of the word "fair"
单项选择题

An Asian engineer is assigned to a US laboratory and almost suffers a nervous breakdown US executive dissension(纷争). A Japanese manager is promoted by his British president, but within six months asks for a transfer. Each of these real-life cases involved people who were regarded as superior employees, but were ill-equipped to cope with the complexities and dangers of intercultural management. "Multinational companies have studied everything else, now they’’re finally looking at culture," says Clifford Clarke, founder and president of the California-based IRI International Inc, one of a small but growing number of consulting firms that specialize in teaching business people from differing cultures how to communicate and work with each other. "Never show the shoe to an Arab, never arrive on time for a party in Brazil, and in Japan, don’’t think ’’yes’’ means ’’yes’’," advise US. consultants Lennie Copland and Lewis Brown Griggs, who have produced a series of films and a book to help managers improve their international business skills. But simply learning the social "dos" and "don’’ts" is not the answer, ac cording to the new culture specialist’’s. The penalties for ignoring different thinking patterns, they point out, can be disastrous. For example, the American manager who promised to be fair thought he was telling his Japanese staff that their hard work would be rewarded, but when some workers received higher salary increases than others, there were complaints. "You told us you’’d be fair, and you lied to us," accused one salesman. "It took me a year and a half", sighed the American, "to realize that ’’fair’’, to my staff, meant being treated equally." The Asian engineer who suffered in America was the victim of another mistaken expectation. "He was accustomed to the warm group environment so typical in Japan," said his U. S. manager. "But in our company, we’’re all expected to be self-starters, who thrive on working a lone. For him, it was emotional starvation. He’’s made the adjustment now, but he’’d be humiliated if I told you his name, That’’s another cultural difference." The Japanese manager who failed to respond to his promotion couldn’’t bring himself to use the more direct language needed to communicate with his London-based superiors. "I used to think all this talk about cultural communication was a lot of balcony," says Eugene J. Flath, president of Intel Japan Ltd. ,a subsidiary of the American semiconductor-maker. "Now, I can see it’’s a real problem." Miscommunication has slowed our ability to coordinate action with our office. "That’’s why Intel, with the help of consultant Clarke, began an intercultural training program this spring which Flath expects will dramatically reduce decision-making time now lost in making sure the Americans and the Japanese understand each other. The cultural communication problems are becoming especially urgent for ______.

A.American managers
B.multinational companies
C.Japanese employees
D.consulting firms
单项选择题

An Asian engineer is assigned to a US laboratory and almost suffers a nervous breakdown US executive dissension(纷争). A Japanese manager is promoted by his British president, but within six months asks for a transfer. Each of these real-life cases involved people who were regarded as superior employees, but were ill-equipped to cope with the complexities and dangers of intercultural management. "Multinational companies have studied everything else, now they’’re finally looking at culture," says Clifford Clarke, founder and president of the California-based IRI International Inc, one of a small but growing number of consulting firms that specialize in teaching business people from differing cultures how to communicate and work with each other. "Never show the shoe to an Arab, never arrive on time for a party in Brazil, and in Japan, don’’t think ’’yes’’ means ’’yes’’," advise US. consultants Lennie Copland and Lewis Brown Griggs, who have produced a series of films and a book to help managers improve their international business skills. But simply learning the social "dos" and "don’’ts" is not the answer, ac cording to the new culture specialist’’s. The penalties for ignoring different thinking patterns, they point out, can be disastrous. For example, the American manager who promised to be fair thought he was telling his Japanese staff that their hard work would be rewarded, but when some workers received higher salary increases than others, there were complaints. "You told us you’’d be fair, and you lied to us," accused one salesman. "It took me a year and a half", sighed the American, "to realize that ’’fair’’, to my staff, meant being treated equally." The Asian engineer who suffered in America was the victim of another mistaken expectation. "He was accustomed to the warm group environment so typical in Japan," said his U. S. manager. "But in our company, we’’re all expected to be self-starters, who thrive on working a lone. For him, it was emotional starvation. He’’s made the adjustment now, but he’’d be humiliated if I told you his name, That’’s another cultural difference." The Japanese manager who failed to respond to his promotion couldn’’t bring himself to use the more direct language needed to communicate with his London-based superiors. "I used to think all this talk about cultural communication was a lot of balcony," says Eugene J. Flath, president of Intel Japan Ltd. ,a subsidiary of the American semiconductor-maker. "Now, I can see it’’s a real problem." Miscommunication has slowed our ability to coordinate action with our office. "That’’s why Intel, with the help of consultant Clarke, began an intercultural training program this spring which Flath expects will dramatically reduce decision-making time now lost in making sure the Americans and the Japanese understand each other. The multinational training program is mostly concerned with the relation between Americans and ______.

A.the Japanese
B.Arabs
C.Brazilians
D.Orientals
单项选择题

An Asian engineer is assigned to a US laboratory and almost suffers a nervous breakdown US executive dissension(纷争). A Japanese manager is promoted by his British president, but within six months asks for a transfer. Each of these real-life cases involved people who were regarded as superior employees, but were ill-equipped to cope with the complexities and dangers of intercultural management. "Multinational companies have studied everything else, now they’’re finally looking at culture," says Clifford Clarke, founder and president of the California-based IRI International Inc, one of a small but growing number of consulting firms that specialize in teaching business people from differing cultures how to communicate and work with each other. "Never show the shoe to an Arab, never arrive on time for a party in Brazil, and in Japan, don’’t think ’’yes’’ means ’’yes’’," advise US. consultants Lennie Copland and Lewis Brown Griggs, who have produced a series of films and a book to help managers improve their international business skills. But simply learning the social "dos" and "don’’ts" is not the answer, ac cording to the new culture specialist’’s. The penalties for ignoring different thinking patterns, they point out, can be disastrous. For example, the American manager who promised to be fair thought he was telling his Japanese staff that their hard work would be rewarded, but when some workers received higher salary increases than others, there were complaints. "You told us you’’d be fair, and you lied to us," accused one salesman. "It took me a year and a half", sighed the American, "to realize that ’’fair’’, to my staff, meant being treated equally." The Asian engineer who suffered in America was the victim of another mistaken expectation. "He was accustomed to the warm group environment so typical in Japan," said his U. S. manager. "But in our company, we’’re all expected to be self-starters, who thrive on working a lone. For him, it was emotional starvation. He’’s made the adjustment now, but he’’d be humiliated if I told you his name, That’’s another cultural difference." The Japanese manager who failed to respond to his promotion couldn’’t bring himself to use the more direct language needed to communicate with his London-based superiors. "I used to think all this talk about cultural communication was a lot of balcony," says Eugene J. Flath, president of Intel Japan Ltd. ,a subsidiary of the American semiconductor-maker. "Now, I can see it’’s a real problem." Miscommunication has slowed our ability to coordinate action with our office. "That’’s why Intel, with the help of consultant Clarke, began an intercultural training program this spring which Flath expects will dramatically reduce decision-making time now lost in making sure the Americans and the Japanese understand each other. The promoted Japanese manager asked for a transfer because ______.

A.he was not competent for the higher position
B.he was not accustomed to working by himself
C.he could not make the adjustment to his new job
D.he lacked adequate communication with his superiors
微信扫码免费搜题