问答题

In each numbered line of the following passage, there is an extra word. Identify the word and write it down on your Answer Sheet. You need not look for any error in the unnumbered line.(10 points) One of the technical means which the modern employer uses in order to【R11】secure to the greatest possible amount of work from his men is the device of【R12】piece-rates. In agriculture, for instance, the gathering up of the harvest is a case,【R13】where to the greatest possible intensity of labour is called for, since, the weather【R14】being uncertain, the difference between high profit and the heavy loss may【R15】depend on the speed with which on the harvesting can be done. Hence a system【R16】of piece-rates is being almost universal in this case. And since the interest of the【R17】employer in that a speeding-up of harvesting increases with the increase of the【R18】results and the intensity of the work, the attempt which has again and again been【R19】made, by increasing the piece-rates of the workmen, thereby giving them up【R20】an opportunity to earn more what is for them a very high wage, to interest them in increasing their own efficiency.【R20】

答案: 正确答案:more
题目列表

你可能感兴趣的试题

问答题

Read the following passage and then compeleted the sentences that follow by filling in the blanks with appropriate information from the text. You may have to use words that summarize the meaning of some portions of the text or spell the word with the initial letter given.(15 points) However, plays change their meaning over time. The elements that modern audiences find most disturbing in The Merchant of Venice would probably not have bothered the average Elizabethan theatergoer, while conversely, Elizabethans would have been aware of social and religious nuances that may be lost on us. Particularly troubling to modern critics is Shylock’s enforced conversion: to the modern sensibility it’s difficult to reconcile Portia’s fine words about charity with the court’s subsequent denial of the Jew’s right to the religion that is the very core of his ethnic identity. This is unlikely to have bothered Elizabethan theatergoers. Compared with the fate that was meted out to Catholic heretics like Edmund Campion, Shylock’s sentence is lenient. Moreover, conversion of the Jews to Christianity was such a central, and proverbial, part of sixteenth-century apocalyptic that it’s unlikely that an Elizabethan audience would have regarded Shylock’s sentence as unreasonable. After all, hadn’t St. Paul himself said that all Israel shall be saved(Rom. 31:26), which the Geneva Bible glossed as meaning that Christians have a duty to work for the conversion of the Jews by spreading the gospel and "the good tidings of salvation which they preached" Elizabethan exegetes believed that conversion of the Jews was the last stage in the grand historical plan outlined in Daniel’s interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream(Daniel 2:31—44.6). The surprising thing about The Merchant of Venice is not that Shakespeare could have written a play that seems to give such free expression to anti-Semitic prejudice, but that in an age when dramatists and their audiences had few inhibitions about such matters, it asks us to question that prejudice. Despite Portia’s flagrant deception of a court of law, most Elizabethan theatergoers would probably have agreed that by the end of Act IV mercy had been shown and justice done; Shylock’s conversion was clearly a matte of being cruel only to be kind. However, that’s not to say that Shylock would have been an uncontroversial figure for a contemporary audience. Though he is portrayed as a Jew, his values seem almost indistinguishable from those of a puritan: he is thrifty and self-righteous("What judgment shall I dread, doing no wrong" - IV. I. 88); he hates music, masquing and revelry; his house is "sober"(n. v. 36); he places great importance on his family(unlike his wifeless, "prodigal" adversary); and his idea of justice is based on the old lex talionis. Jews may not have been a pressing social issue in Elizabethan England but puritans certainly were... In The Merchant of Venice Shakespeare was more circumspect than he was in the two later plays, and used a politically uncontroversial hate-figure to stand for the puritan sensibility. The link was not entirely arbitrary. As a way of confirming their status as God’s chosen people, some fundamentalist puritans actually referred to themselves as Israelites.... The parallel between puritans and Jew was sufficiently familiar to be made a topic of anti-puritan satire.The author states that responses to a play man______(1 word)as history goes on.

答案: 正确答案:vary/change
问答题

Read the following passage and then answer the questions either by writing briefly or completing the gaps in the sentences.(15 points) The survival of traditional elements in novel and emerging value systems is unavoidable and difficult to control when the assimilation of the old into the new actually occurs. Hence, it would be unfair to attribute the absence of a carefully formulated theory of human excellence suitable to the cultural climate of contemporary man exclusive to the undetected religious background of the defenders of recent humanism. The reluctance to come to grips with the problems which the quest for excellence poses has its roots partly in the modern interpretations of the place of the scientific method in ethics, and partly in the current views about human nature. The former points to the demand to keep ethical generalizations as open and provisional in character as scientific hypotheses are, with the obvious merit of securing for ethics freedom from dogmatism and preserving in its conclusions the pluralistic and open-textured qualities of experience. The latter has permitted ethical theory to bypass thorny issues that attend the systematic effort to base substantive considerations and definite valuational prescriptions on a theory of man supported by rigorous scientific evidence. The consensus among behavioral scientists has been for quite some time that the nature of man is to have no nature. In the face of such formidable obstacles from the sciences of man, the science of the good life was never launched. Given the widespread prevalence of this fluid conception of human nature, it is easy to see why efforts to formulate a system of humanistic excellences within the scope of substantive ethics have been by and large inhibited. It is common knowledge that professional philosophers have cautiously avoided even mentioning the existence of such an enterprise in their list of endeavors. The only course left open to the daring advocates of nonreligious substantive ethics was mainly one which led to a soft and scientifically inoffensive "open-textured" humanism of fulfillments. The philosophy on which the view rested was as derivative as the utilitarian and pragmatic features which constituted its basic appeal. What has been missing all along was the bold effort needed to give the new humanism the respectable objectivity that only a science of the good life could provide. But in the absence of a firm foundation the gospel of plural fulfillments is subject to the same treatment given to loud our critical faculties. One thing is clear: the new humanism has demonstrated its power to persuade. What the time calls for is more wisdom. It is precisely on this point that the humanism of classical Greece has demonstrated its relevance, but not every humanist is prepared to agree with me on this issue.What will certainly remain in new sets of moral principles and standards

答案: 正确答案:Traditional elements.
问答题

Read the following passage and then compeleted the sentences that follow by filling in the blanks with appropriate information from the text. You may have to use words that summarize the meaning of some portions of the text or spell the word with the initial letter given.(15 points) However, plays change their meaning over time. The elements that modern audiences find most disturbing in The Merchant of Venice would probably not have bothered the average Elizabethan theatergoer, while conversely, Elizabethans would have been aware of social and religious nuances that may be lost on us. Particularly troubling to modern critics is Shylock’s enforced conversion: to the modern sensibility it’s difficult to reconcile Portia’s fine words about charity with the court’s subsequent denial of the Jew’s right to the religion that is the very core of his ethnic identity. This is unlikely to have bothered Elizabethan theatergoers. Compared with the fate that was meted out to Catholic heretics like Edmund Campion, Shylock’s sentence is lenient. Moreover, conversion of the Jews to Christianity was such a central, and proverbial, part of sixteenth-century apocalyptic that it’s unlikely that an Elizabethan audience would have regarded Shylock’s sentence as unreasonable. After all, hadn’t St. Paul himself said that all Israel shall be saved(Rom. 31:26), which the Geneva Bible glossed as meaning that Christians have a duty to work for the conversion of the Jews by spreading the gospel and "the good tidings of salvation which they preached" Elizabethan exegetes believed that conversion of the Jews was the last stage in the grand historical plan outlined in Daniel’s interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream(Daniel 2:31—44.6). The surprising thing about The Merchant of Venice is not that Shakespeare could have written a play that seems to give such free expression to anti-Semitic prejudice, but that in an age when dramatists and their audiences had few inhibitions about such matters, it asks us to question that prejudice. Despite Portia’s flagrant deception of a court of law, most Elizabethan theatergoers would probably have agreed that by the end of Act IV mercy had been shown and justice done; Shylock’s conversion was clearly a matte of being cruel only to be kind. However, that’s not to say that Shylock would have been an uncontroversial figure for a contemporary audience. Though he is portrayed as a Jew, his values seem almost indistinguishable from those of a puritan: he is thrifty and self-righteous("What judgment shall I dread, doing no wrong" - IV. I. 88); he hates music, masquing and revelry; his house is "sober"(n. v. 36); he places great importance on his family(unlike his wifeless, "prodigal" adversary); and his idea of justice is based on the old lex talionis. Jews may not have been a pressing social issue in Elizabethan England but puritans certainly were... In The Merchant of Venice Shakespeare was more circumspect than he was in the two later plays, and used a politically uncontroversial hate-figure to stand for the puritan sensibility. The link was not entirely arbitrary. As a way of confirming their status as God’s chosen people, some fundamentalist puritans actually referred to themselves as Israelites.... The parallel between puritans and Jew was sufficiently familiar to be made a topic of anti-puritan satire.Modern audiences may fail to perceive some______(4 words)in The Merchant of Venice which seemed obvious to Elizabethans.

答案: 正确答案:social and religious nuances
问答题

Read the following passage and then answer the questions either by writing briefly or completing the gaps in the sentences.(15 points) The survival of traditional elements in novel and emerging value systems is unavoidable and difficult to control when the assimilation of the old into the new actually occurs. Hence, it would be unfair to attribute the absence of a carefully formulated theory of human excellence suitable to the cultural climate of contemporary man exclusive to the undetected religious background of the defenders of recent humanism. The reluctance to come to grips with the problems which the quest for excellence poses has its roots partly in the modern interpretations of the place of the scientific method in ethics, and partly in the current views about human nature. The former points to the demand to keep ethical generalizations as open and provisional in character as scientific hypotheses are, with the obvious merit of securing for ethics freedom from dogmatism and preserving in its conclusions the pluralistic and open-textured qualities of experience. The latter has permitted ethical theory to bypass thorny issues that attend the systematic effort to base substantive considerations and definite valuational prescriptions on a theory of man supported by rigorous scientific evidence. The consensus among behavioral scientists has been for quite some time that the nature of man is to have no nature. In the face of such formidable obstacles from the sciences of man, the science of the good life was never launched. Given the widespread prevalence of this fluid conception of human nature, it is easy to see why efforts to formulate a system of humanistic excellences within the scope of substantive ethics have been by and large inhibited. It is common knowledge that professional philosophers have cautiously avoided even mentioning the existence of such an enterprise in their list of endeavors. The only course left open to the daring advocates of nonreligious substantive ethics was mainly one which led to a soft and scientifically inoffensive "open-textured" humanism of fulfillments. The philosophy on which the view rested was as derivative as the utilitarian and pragmatic features which constituted its basic appeal. What has been missing all along was the bold effort needed to give the new humanism the respectable objectivity that only a science of the good life could provide. But in the absence of a firm foundation the gospel of plural fulfillments is subject to the same treatment given to loud our critical faculties. One thing is clear: the new humanism has demonstrated its power to persuade. What the time calls for is more wisdom. It is precisely on this point that the humanism of classical Greece has demonstrated its relevance, but not every humanist is prepared to agree with me on this issue.What would be an invalid reason for explaining a cultural phenomenon

答案: 正确答案:The undetected religious background of the defenders of...
单项选择题

Read the following passage and answer the questions listed below. Write your answers on the Answer Sheet.(10 points) Japan is the biggest waster of women. Though the proportion of its women in the labor force is rising rapidly, it still has the industrial world’s deepest "M" shaped graph of female labor-force participation—the proportion rises to 70% by the age of 25, but then fall falls to 50% as women are forced to quit when they get married, rising again only after the age of 35. Though some Japanese firms are catching on to women’s potential, and many are luring women as part-time factory workers, most have so far paid more attention to gray-haired males. Older people should be ideal targets for corporate recruiters everywhere. They are less likely to miss work, more polite to customers, and more loyal than their younger counterparts. In practice though, surely all they want to do is retire. The average age at which American men retire has declined from 65 in 1963 to 62 today and seems set to decline further. The few companies that are trying to halt that trend are an unconventional minority. On the Conference Board’s reckoning, 62% of American companies offer early retirement plans and only 4% offer inducements to delay retirement. That will change as American companies weigh the difficulties of recruiting new workers against the advantages of retaining old hands. Varian, a Silicon Valley company engaged in high-tech wizardry, is pioneering the way. Its phased-retirement plan permits employees who are 55 or ode to work 20-32 hours a week for as long as they and the company wish. Retired people in America are allowed to work for 1,000 hours a year without affecting their pension and health benefits. Japan’s old people are, you guessed it, workaholics: most big firms have moved their retirement ages from 55 to 60 in recent years, to please their workers as well as to relieve the labour shortage. But there is a quid pro quo: many firms have adjusted their seniority stems so that the highest wages are paid at around 45 rather than just before retirement, in order to hold down labor costs. More than 60% of Japanese men over 55 are still working, compared with 40% in America. And Japanese women lead the world in one respect, at least: at 30%, their labor participation rate over the age of 55 is industrial world’s highest. European companies are also waking up to the potential of hiring older workers. In the first six months of 1989 a British supermarket chain, Tesco, recruited around 1,500 people in their 50s and 60s with a "Life Begins at 55" campaign. At a recent conference in West Germany on the country’s graying society, sponsored by BDI, the employers’ confederation, two-thirds of the companies said they employed old-age pensioners part-time, and 75% said they expect to lure someone over 50 in the next year. With the youngest pensionable age in Europe, Germany has a huge reservoir of trained labor. All the signs are that it will need it.According to the passage, the Japanese women have the following work participation pattern:

A.More newly married women work than girls, but fewer than women over 35
B.Equal proportion of girls and married women over 35 go to work, but fewer than newly married women
C.Far more girls work than newly married women, but more women return to work when they are over 35
D.Fewer newly married women keep working than girls, an even fewer women go to work when they are over 35
问答题

Read the following passage and then compeleted the sentences that follow by filling in the blanks with appropriate information from the text. You may have to use words that summarize the meaning of some portions of the text or spell the word with the initial letter given.(15 points) However, plays change their meaning over time. The elements that modern audiences find most disturbing in The Merchant of Venice would probably not have bothered the average Elizabethan theatergoer, while conversely, Elizabethans would have been aware of social and religious nuances that may be lost on us. Particularly troubling to modern critics is Shylock’s enforced conversion: to the modern sensibility it’s difficult to reconcile Portia’s fine words about charity with the court’s subsequent denial of the Jew’s right to the religion that is the very core of his ethnic identity. This is unlikely to have bothered Elizabethan theatergoers. Compared with the fate that was meted out to Catholic heretics like Edmund Campion, Shylock’s sentence is lenient. Moreover, conversion of the Jews to Christianity was such a central, and proverbial, part of sixteenth-century apocalyptic that it’s unlikely that an Elizabethan audience would have regarded Shylock’s sentence as unreasonable. After all, hadn’t St. Paul himself said that all Israel shall be saved(Rom. 31:26), which the Geneva Bible glossed as meaning that Christians have a duty to work for the conversion of the Jews by spreading the gospel and "the good tidings of salvation which they preached" Elizabethan exegetes believed that conversion of the Jews was the last stage in the grand historical plan outlined in Daniel’s interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream(Daniel 2:31—44.6). The surprising thing about The Merchant of Venice is not that Shakespeare could have written a play that seems to give such free expression to anti-Semitic prejudice, but that in an age when dramatists and their audiences had few inhibitions about such matters, it asks us to question that prejudice. Despite Portia’s flagrant deception of a court of law, most Elizabethan theatergoers would probably have agreed that by the end of Act IV mercy had been shown and justice done; Shylock’s conversion was clearly a matte of being cruel only to be kind. However, that’s not to say that Shylock would have been an uncontroversial figure for a contemporary audience. Though he is portrayed as a Jew, his values seem almost indistinguishable from those of a puritan: he is thrifty and self-righteous("What judgment shall I dread, doing no wrong" - IV. I. 88); he hates music, masquing and revelry; his house is "sober"(n. v. 36); he places great importance on his family(unlike his wifeless, "prodigal" adversary); and his idea of justice is based on the old lex talionis. Jews may not have been a pressing social issue in Elizabethan England but puritans certainly were... In The Merchant of Venice Shakespeare was more circumspect than he was in the two later plays, and used a politically uncontroversial hate-figure to stand for the puritan sensibility. The link was not entirely arbitrary. As a way of confirming their status as God’s chosen people, some fundamentalist puritans actually referred to themselves as Israelites.... The parallel between puritans and Jew was sufficiently familiar to be made a topic of anti-puritan satire.______(3 words)most disturbs modern critics because there is a discrepancy between rhetoric and practice in The Merchant of Venice.

答案: 正确答案:Shylock’s enforced conversion
问答题

Read the following passage and then answer the questions either by writing briefly or completing the gaps in the sentences.(15 points) The survival of traditional elements in novel and emerging value systems is unavoidable and difficult to control when the assimilation of the old into the new actually occurs. Hence, it would be unfair to attribute the absence of a carefully formulated theory of human excellence suitable to the cultural climate of contemporary man exclusive to the undetected religious background of the defenders of recent humanism. The reluctance to come to grips with the problems which the quest for excellence poses has its roots partly in the modern interpretations of the place of the scientific method in ethics, and partly in the current views about human nature. The former points to the demand to keep ethical generalizations as open and provisional in character as scientific hypotheses are, with the obvious merit of securing for ethics freedom from dogmatism and preserving in its conclusions the pluralistic and open-textured qualities of experience. The latter has permitted ethical theory to bypass thorny issues that attend the systematic effort to base substantive considerations and definite valuational prescriptions on a theory of man supported by rigorous scientific evidence. The consensus among behavioral scientists has been for quite some time that the nature of man is to have no nature. In the face of such formidable obstacles from the sciences of man, the science of the good life was never launched. Given the widespread prevalence of this fluid conception of human nature, it is easy to see why efforts to formulate a system of humanistic excellences within the scope of substantive ethics have been by and large inhibited. It is common knowledge that professional philosophers have cautiously avoided even mentioning the existence of such an enterprise in their list of endeavors. The only course left open to the daring advocates of nonreligious substantive ethics was mainly one which led to a soft and scientifically inoffensive "open-textured" humanism of fulfillments. The philosophy on which the view rested was as derivative as the utilitarian and pragmatic features which constituted its basic appeal. What has been missing all along was the bold effort needed to give the new humanism the respectable objectivity that only a science of the good life could provide. But in the absence of a firm foundation the gospel of plural fulfillments is subject to the same treatment given to loud our critical faculties. One thing is clear: the new humanism has demonstrated its power to persuade. What the time calls for is more wisdom. It is precisely on this point that the humanism of classical Greece has demonstrated its relevance, but not every humanist is prepared to agree with me on this issue.Which phrase in the text means "to understand or deal with something difficult"

答案: 正确答案:Come to grips with.
单项选择题

Read the following passage and answer the questions listed below. Write your answers on the Answer Sheet.(10 points) Japan is the biggest waster of women. Though the proportion of its women in the labor force is rising rapidly, it still has the industrial world’s deepest "M" shaped graph of female labor-force participation—the proportion rises to 70% by the age of 25, but then fall falls to 50% as women are forced to quit when they get married, rising again only after the age of 35. Though some Japanese firms are catching on to women’s potential, and many are luring women as part-time factory workers, most have so far paid more attention to gray-haired males. Older people should be ideal targets for corporate recruiters everywhere. They are less likely to miss work, more polite to customers, and more loyal than their younger counterparts. In practice though, surely all they want to do is retire. The average age at which American men retire has declined from 65 in 1963 to 62 today and seems set to decline further. The few companies that are trying to halt that trend are an unconventional minority. On the Conference Board’s reckoning, 62% of American companies offer early retirement plans and only 4% offer inducements to delay retirement. That will change as American companies weigh the difficulties of recruiting new workers against the advantages of retaining old hands. Varian, a Silicon Valley company engaged in high-tech wizardry, is pioneering the way. Its phased-retirement plan permits employees who are 55 or ode to work 20-32 hours a week for as long as they and the company wish. Retired people in America are allowed to work for 1,000 hours a year without affecting their pension and health benefits. Japan’s old people are, you guessed it, workaholics: most big firms have moved their retirement ages from 55 to 60 in recent years, to please their workers as well as to relieve the labour shortage. But there is a quid pro quo: many firms have adjusted their seniority stems so that the highest wages are paid at around 45 rather than just before retirement, in order to hold down labor costs. More than 60% of Japanese men over 55 are still working, compared with 40% in America. And Japanese women lead the world in one respect, at least: at 30%, their labor participation rate over the age of 55 is industrial world’s highest. European companies are also waking up to the potential of hiring older workers. In the first six months of 1989 a British supermarket chain, Tesco, recruited around 1,500 people in their 50s and 60s with a "Life Begins at 55" campaign. At a recent conference in West Germany on the country’s graying society, sponsored by BDI, the employers’ confederation, two-thirds of the companies said they employed old-age pensioners part-time, and 75% said they expect to lure someone over 50 in the next year. With the youngest pensionable age in Europe, Germany has a huge reservoir of trained labor. All the signs are that it will need it.Japanese firms prefer to employ older male workers than to hire women because______.

A.women can only work as part-timers, and they are generally lazy too
B.older males possess many important ideal qualities as employees
C.older males have grey hair and working experience
D.women do not have potential and are unable to work after marriage
问答题

Read the following passage and then answer the questions either by writing briefly or completing the gaps in the sentences.(15 points) The survival of traditional elements in novel and emerging value systems is unavoidable and difficult to control when the assimilation of the old into the new actually occurs. Hence, it would be unfair to attribute the absence of a carefully formulated theory of human excellence suitable to the cultural climate of contemporary man exclusive to the undetected religious background of the defenders of recent humanism. The reluctance to come to grips with the problems which the quest for excellence poses has its roots partly in the modern interpretations of the place of the scientific method in ethics, and partly in the current views about human nature. The former points to the demand to keep ethical generalizations as open and provisional in character as scientific hypotheses are, with the obvious merit of securing for ethics freedom from dogmatism and preserving in its conclusions the pluralistic and open-textured qualities of experience. The latter has permitted ethical theory to bypass thorny issues that attend the systematic effort to base substantive considerations and definite valuational prescriptions on a theory of man supported by rigorous scientific evidence. The consensus among behavioral scientists has been for quite some time that the nature of man is to have no nature. In the face of such formidable obstacles from the sciences of man, the science of the good life was never launched. Given the widespread prevalence of this fluid conception of human nature, it is easy to see why efforts to formulate a system of humanistic excellences within the scope of substantive ethics have been by and large inhibited. It is common knowledge that professional philosophers have cautiously avoided even mentioning the existence of such an enterprise in their list of endeavors. The only course left open to the daring advocates of nonreligious substantive ethics was mainly one which led to a soft and scientifically inoffensive "open-textured" humanism of fulfillments. The philosophy on which the view rested was as derivative as the utilitarian and pragmatic features which constituted its basic appeal. What has been missing all along was the bold effort needed to give the new humanism the respectable objectivity that only a science of the good life could provide. But in the absence of a firm foundation the gospel of plural fulfillments is subject to the same treatment given to loud our critical faculties. One thing is clear: the new humanism has demonstrated its power to persuade. What the time calls for is more wisdom. It is precisely on this point that the humanism of classical Greece has demonstrated its relevance, but not every humanist is prepared to agree with me on this issue.If ethics is to be out of the control of dogmatism, then what qualities must its generalizations have

答案: 正确答案:Open and provisional in character.
问答题

Read the following passage and then compeleted the sentences that follow by filling in the blanks with appropriate information from the text. You may have to use words that summarize the meaning of some portions of the text or spell the word with the initial letter given.(15 points) However, plays change their meaning over time. The elements that modern audiences find most disturbing in The Merchant of Venice would probably not have bothered the average Elizabethan theatergoer, while conversely, Elizabethans would have been aware of social and religious nuances that may be lost on us. Particularly troubling to modern critics is Shylock’s enforced conversion: to the modern sensibility it’s difficult to reconcile Portia’s fine words about charity with the court’s subsequent denial of the Jew’s right to the religion that is the very core of his ethnic identity. This is unlikely to have bothered Elizabethan theatergoers. Compared with the fate that was meted out to Catholic heretics like Edmund Campion, Shylock’s sentence is lenient. Moreover, conversion of the Jews to Christianity was such a central, and proverbial, part of sixteenth-century apocalyptic that it’s unlikely that an Elizabethan audience would have regarded Shylock’s sentence as unreasonable. After all, hadn’t St. Paul himself said that all Israel shall be saved(Rom. 31:26), which the Geneva Bible glossed as meaning that Christians have a duty to work for the conversion of the Jews by spreading the gospel and "the good tidings of salvation which they preached" Elizabethan exegetes believed that conversion of the Jews was the last stage in the grand historical plan outlined in Daniel’s interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream(Daniel 2:31—44.6). The surprising thing about The Merchant of Venice is not that Shakespeare could have written a play that seems to give such free expression to anti-Semitic prejudice, but that in an age when dramatists and their audiences had few inhibitions about such matters, it asks us to question that prejudice. Despite Portia’s flagrant deception of a court of law, most Elizabethan theatergoers would probably have agreed that by the end of Act IV mercy had been shown and justice done; Shylock’s conversion was clearly a matte of being cruel only to be kind. However, that’s not to say that Shylock would have been an uncontroversial figure for a contemporary audience. Though he is portrayed as a Jew, his values seem almost indistinguishable from those of a puritan: he is thrifty and self-righteous("What judgment shall I dread, doing no wrong" - IV. I. 88); he hates music, masquing and revelry; his house is "sober"(n. v. 36); he places great importance on his family(unlike his wifeless, "prodigal" adversary); and his idea of justice is based on the old lex talionis. Jews may not have been a pressing social issue in Elizabethan England but puritans certainly were... In The Merchant of Venice Shakespeare was more circumspect than he was in the two later plays, and used a politically uncontroversial hate-figure to stand for the puritan sensibility. The link was not entirely arbitrary. As a way of confirming their status as God’s chosen people, some fundamentalist puritans actually referred to themselves as Israelites.... The parallel between puritans and Jew was sufficiently familiar to be made a topic of anti-puritan satire.The phrase that means "apportion or allot" in the text is______.

答案: 正确答案:mete out
单项选择题

Read the following passage and answer the questions listed below. Write your answers on the Answer Sheet.(10 points) Japan is the biggest waster of women. Though the proportion of its women in the labor force is rising rapidly, it still has the industrial world’s deepest "M" shaped graph of female labor-force participation—the proportion rises to 70% by the age of 25, but then fall falls to 50% as women are forced to quit when they get married, rising again only after the age of 35. Though some Japanese firms are catching on to women’s potential, and many are luring women as part-time factory workers, most have so far paid more attention to gray-haired males. Older people should be ideal targets for corporate recruiters everywhere. They are less likely to miss work, more polite to customers, and more loyal than their younger counterparts. In practice though, surely all they want to do is retire. The average age at which American men retire has declined from 65 in 1963 to 62 today and seems set to decline further. The few companies that are trying to halt that trend are an unconventional minority. On the Conference Board’s reckoning, 62% of American companies offer early retirement plans and only 4% offer inducements to delay retirement. That will change as American companies weigh the difficulties of recruiting new workers against the advantages of retaining old hands. Varian, a Silicon Valley company engaged in high-tech wizardry, is pioneering the way. Its phased-retirement plan permits employees who are 55 or ode to work 20-32 hours a week for as long as they and the company wish. Retired people in America are allowed to work for 1,000 hours a year without affecting their pension and health benefits. Japan’s old people are, you guessed it, workaholics: most big firms have moved their retirement ages from 55 to 60 in recent years, to please their workers as well as to relieve the labour shortage. But there is a quid pro quo: many firms have adjusted their seniority stems so that the highest wages are paid at around 45 rather than just before retirement, in order to hold down labor costs. More than 60% of Japanese men over 55 are still working, compared with 40% in America. And Japanese women lead the world in one respect, at least: at 30%, their labor participation rate over the age of 55 is industrial world’s highest. European companies are also waking up to the potential of hiring older workers. In the first six months of 1989 a British supermarket chain, Tesco, recruited around 1,500 people in their 50s and 60s with a "Life Begins at 55" campaign. At a recent conference in West Germany on the country’s graying society, sponsored by BDI, the employers’ confederation, two-thirds of the companies said they employed old-age pensioners part-time, and 75% said they expect to lure someone over 50 in the next year. With the youngest pensionable age in Europe, Germany has a huge reservoir of trained labor. All the signs are that it will need it.According to the second paragraph, which of the following statements is true of American men retirement

A.American men workers will probably retire at the age of 60 in the future.
B.American men workers are likely to work older than before.
C.The majority of American companies may allow their employees to work longer.
D.The minority of American companies are hesitant in coming up with their plan to delay retirement.
问答题

Read the following passage and then answer the questions either by writing briefly or completing the gaps in the sentences.(15 points) The survival of traditional elements in novel and emerging value systems is unavoidable and difficult to control when the assimilation of the old into the new actually occurs. Hence, it would be unfair to attribute the absence of a carefully formulated theory of human excellence suitable to the cultural climate of contemporary man exclusive to the undetected religious background of the defenders of recent humanism. The reluctance to come to grips with the problems which the quest for excellence poses has its roots partly in the modern interpretations of the place of the scientific method in ethics, and partly in the current views about human nature. The former points to the demand to keep ethical generalizations as open and provisional in character as scientific hypotheses are, with the obvious merit of securing for ethics freedom from dogmatism and preserving in its conclusions the pluralistic and open-textured qualities of experience. The latter has permitted ethical theory to bypass thorny issues that attend the systematic effort to base substantive considerations and definite valuational prescriptions on a theory of man supported by rigorous scientific evidence. The consensus among behavioral scientists has been for quite some time that the nature of man is to have no nature. In the face of such formidable obstacles from the sciences of man, the science of the good life was never launched. Given the widespread prevalence of this fluid conception of human nature, it is easy to see why efforts to formulate a system of humanistic excellences within the scope of substantive ethics have been by and large inhibited. It is common knowledge that professional philosophers have cautiously avoided even mentioning the existence of such an enterprise in their list of endeavors. The only course left open to the daring advocates of nonreligious substantive ethics was mainly one which led to a soft and scientifically inoffensive "open-textured" humanism of fulfillments. The philosophy on which the view rested was as derivative as the utilitarian and pragmatic features which constituted its basic appeal. What has been missing all along was the bold effort needed to give the new humanism the respectable objectivity that only a science of the good life could provide. But in the absence of a firm foundation the gospel of plural fulfillments is subject to the same treatment given to loud our critical faculties. One thing is clear: the new humanism has demonstrated its power to persuade. What the time calls for is more wisdom. It is precisely on this point that the humanism of classical Greece has demonstrated its relevance, but not every humanist is prepared to agree with me on this issue.What point do behavioral scientists agree on

答案: 正确答案:The nature of man is to have no nature.
问答题

Read the following passage and then compeleted the sentences that follow by filling in the blanks with appropriate information from the text. You may have to use words that summarize the meaning of some portions of the text or spell the word with the initial letter given.(15 points) However, plays change their meaning over time. The elements that modern audiences find most disturbing in The Merchant of Venice would probably not have bothered the average Elizabethan theatergoer, while conversely, Elizabethans would have been aware of social and religious nuances that may be lost on us. Particularly troubling to modern critics is Shylock’s enforced conversion: to the modern sensibility it’s difficult to reconcile Portia’s fine words about charity with the court’s subsequent denial of the Jew’s right to the religion that is the very core of his ethnic identity. This is unlikely to have bothered Elizabethan theatergoers. Compared with the fate that was meted out to Catholic heretics like Edmund Campion, Shylock’s sentence is lenient. Moreover, conversion of the Jews to Christianity was such a central, and proverbial, part of sixteenth-century apocalyptic that it’s unlikely that an Elizabethan audience would have regarded Shylock’s sentence as unreasonable. After all, hadn’t St. Paul himself said that all Israel shall be saved(Rom. 31:26), which the Geneva Bible glossed as meaning that Christians have a duty to work for the conversion of the Jews by spreading the gospel and "the good tidings of salvation which they preached" Elizabethan exegetes believed that conversion of the Jews was the last stage in the grand historical plan outlined in Daniel’s interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream(Daniel 2:31—44.6). The surprising thing about The Merchant of Venice is not that Shakespeare could have written a play that seems to give such free expression to anti-Semitic prejudice, but that in an age when dramatists and their audiences had few inhibitions about such matters, it asks us to question that prejudice. Despite Portia’s flagrant deception of a court of law, most Elizabethan theatergoers would probably have agreed that by the end of Act IV mercy had been shown and justice done; Shylock’s conversion was clearly a matte of being cruel only to be kind. However, that’s not to say that Shylock would have been an uncontroversial figure for a contemporary audience. Though he is portrayed as a Jew, his values seem almost indistinguishable from those of a puritan: he is thrifty and self-righteous("What judgment shall I dread, doing no wrong" - IV. I. 88); he hates music, masquing and revelry; his house is "sober"(n. v. 36); he places great importance on his family(unlike his wifeless, "prodigal" adversary); and his idea of justice is based on the old lex talionis. Jews may not have been a pressing social issue in Elizabethan England but puritans certainly were... In The Merchant of Venice Shakespeare was more circumspect than he was in the two later plays, and used a politically uncontroversial hate-figure to stand for the puritan sensibility. The link was not entirely arbitrary. As a way of confirming their status as God’s chosen people, some fundamentalist puritans actually referred to themselves as Israelites.... The parallel between puritans and Jew was sufficiently familiar to be made a topic of anti-puritan satire.The verdict on Shylock was in keeping with the contemporary religious expectation and would not be felt______.(1 word)

答案: 正确答案:unreasonable
单项选择题

Read the following passage and answer the questions listed below. Write your answers on the Answer Sheet.(10 points) Japan is the biggest waster of women. Though the proportion of its women in the labor force is rising rapidly, it still has the industrial world’s deepest "M" shaped graph of female labor-force participation—the proportion rises to 70% by the age of 25, but then fall falls to 50% as women are forced to quit when they get married, rising again only after the age of 35. Though some Japanese firms are catching on to women’s potential, and many are luring women as part-time factory workers, most have so far paid more attention to gray-haired males. Older people should be ideal targets for corporate recruiters everywhere. They are less likely to miss work, more polite to customers, and more loyal than their younger counterparts. In practice though, surely all they want to do is retire. The average age at which American men retire has declined from 65 in 1963 to 62 today and seems set to decline further. The few companies that are trying to halt that trend are an unconventional minority. On the Conference Board’s reckoning, 62% of American companies offer early retirement plans and only 4% offer inducements to delay retirement. That will change as American companies weigh the difficulties of recruiting new workers against the advantages of retaining old hands. Varian, a Silicon Valley company engaged in high-tech wizardry, is pioneering the way. Its phased-retirement plan permits employees who are 55 or ode to work 20-32 hours a week for as long as they and the company wish. Retired people in America are allowed to work for 1,000 hours a year without affecting their pension and health benefits. Japan’s old people are, you guessed it, workaholics: most big firms have moved their retirement ages from 55 to 60 in recent years, to please their workers as well as to relieve the labour shortage. But there is a quid pro quo: many firms have adjusted their seniority stems so that the highest wages are paid at around 45 rather than just before retirement, in order to hold down labor costs. More than 60% of Japanese men over 55 are still working, compared with 40% in America. And Japanese women lead the world in one respect, at least: at 30%, their labor participation rate over the age of 55 is industrial world’s highest. European companies are also waking up to the potential of hiring older workers. In the first six months of 1989 a British supermarket chain, Tesco, recruited around 1,500 people in their 50s and 60s with a "Life Begins at 55" campaign. At a recent conference in West Germany on the country’s graying society, sponsored by BDI, the employers’ confederation, two-thirds of the companies said they employed old-age pensioners part-time, and 75% said they expect to lure someone over 50 in the next year. With the youngest pensionable age in Europe, Germany has a huge reservoir of trained labor. All the signs are that it will need it.As far as employment policy is concerned, European companies______.

A.are totally different from American and Japanese companies
B.like to lure a younger workforce than an older one
C.do not have any special preference to any age group
D.are coming to realize the value of older workers as American companies do
问答题

Read the following passage and then answer the questions either by writing briefly or completing the gaps in the sentences.(15 points) The survival of traditional elements in novel and emerging value systems is unavoidable and difficult to control when the assimilation of the old into the new actually occurs. Hence, it would be unfair to attribute the absence of a carefully formulated theory of human excellence suitable to the cultural climate of contemporary man exclusive to the undetected religious background of the defenders of recent humanism. The reluctance to come to grips with the problems which the quest for excellence poses has its roots partly in the modern interpretations of the place of the scientific method in ethics, and partly in the current views about human nature. The former points to the demand to keep ethical generalizations as open and provisional in character as scientific hypotheses are, with the obvious merit of securing for ethics freedom from dogmatism and preserving in its conclusions the pluralistic and open-textured qualities of experience. The latter has permitted ethical theory to bypass thorny issues that attend the systematic effort to base substantive considerations and definite valuational prescriptions on a theory of man supported by rigorous scientific evidence. The consensus among behavioral scientists has been for quite some time that the nature of man is to have no nature. In the face of such formidable obstacles from the sciences of man, the science of the good life was never launched. Given the widespread prevalence of this fluid conception of human nature, it is easy to see why efforts to formulate a system of humanistic excellences within the scope of substantive ethics have been by and large inhibited. It is common knowledge that professional philosophers have cautiously avoided even mentioning the existence of such an enterprise in their list of endeavors. The only course left open to the daring advocates of nonreligious substantive ethics was mainly one which led to a soft and scientifically inoffensive "open-textured" humanism of fulfillments. The philosophy on which the view rested was as derivative as the utilitarian and pragmatic features which constituted its basic appeal. What has been missing all along was the bold effort needed to give the new humanism the respectable objectivity that only a science of the good life could provide. But in the absence of a firm foundation the gospel of plural fulfillments is subject to the same treatment given to loud our critical faculties. One thing is clear: the new humanism has demonstrated its power to persuade. What the time calls for is more wisdom. It is precisely on this point that the humanism of classical Greece has demonstrated its relevance, but not every humanist is prepared to agree with me on this issue.It can be inferred from the passage that there is no fixed idea about______.(2 words)

答案: 正确答案:human nature
问答题

Read the following passage and then compeleted the sentences that follow by filling in the blanks with appropriate information from the text. You may have to use words that summarize the meaning of some portions of the text or spell the word with the initial letter given.(15 points) However, plays change their meaning over time. The elements that modern audiences find most disturbing in The Merchant of Venice would probably not have bothered the average Elizabethan theatergoer, while conversely, Elizabethans would have been aware of social and religious nuances that may be lost on us. Particularly troubling to modern critics is Shylock’s enforced conversion: to the modern sensibility it’s difficult to reconcile Portia’s fine words about charity with the court’s subsequent denial of the Jew’s right to the religion that is the very core of his ethnic identity. This is unlikely to have bothered Elizabethan theatergoers. Compared with the fate that was meted out to Catholic heretics like Edmund Campion, Shylock’s sentence is lenient. Moreover, conversion of the Jews to Christianity was such a central, and proverbial, part of sixteenth-century apocalyptic that it’s unlikely that an Elizabethan audience would have regarded Shylock’s sentence as unreasonable. After all, hadn’t St. Paul himself said that all Israel shall be saved(Rom. 31:26), which the Geneva Bible glossed as meaning that Christians have a duty to work for the conversion of the Jews by spreading the gospel and "the good tidings of salvation which they preached" Elizabethan exegetes believed that conversion of the Jews was the last stage in the grand historical plan outlined in Daniel’s interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream(Daniel 2:31—44.6). The surprising thing about The Merchant of Venice is not that Shakespeare could have written a play that seems to give such free expression to anti-Semitic prejudice, but that in an age when dramatists and their audiences had few inhibitions about such matters, it asks us to question that prejudice. Despite Portia’s flagrant deception of a court of law, most Elizabethan theatergoers would probably have agreed that by the end of Act IV mercy had been shown and justice done; Shylock’s conversion was clearly a matte of being cruel only to be kind. However, that’s not to say that Shylock would have been an uncontroversial figure for a contemporary audience. Though he is portrayed as a Jew, his values seem almost indistinguishable from those of a puritan: he is thrifty and self-righteous("What judgment shall I dread, doing no wrong" - IV. I. 88); he hates music, masquing and revelry; his house is "sober"(n. v. 36); he places great importance on his family(unlike his wifeless, "prodigal" adversary); and his idea of justice is based on the old lex talionis. Jews may not have been a pressing social issue in Elizabethan England but puritans certainly were... In The Merchant of Venice Shakespeare was more circumspect than he was in the two later plays, and used a politically uncontroversial hate-figure to stand for the puritan sensibility. The link was not entirely arbitrary. As a way of confirming their status as God’s chosen people, some fundamentalist puritans actually referred to themselves as Israelites.... The parallel between puritans and Jew was sufficiently familiar to be made a topic of anti-puritan satire.What is unexpected about The Merchant of Venice is that it requires the spectators to cast doubt on a______.(1 word)

答案: 正确答案:prejudice
单项选择题

Read the following passage and answer the questions listed below. Write your answers on the Answer Sheet.(10 points) Japan is the biggest waster of women. Though the proportion of its women in the labor force is rising rapidly, it still has the industrial world’s deepest "M" shaped graph of female labor-force participation—the proportion rises to 70% by the age of 25, but then fall falls to 50% as women are forced to quit when they get married, rising again only after the age of 35. Though some Japanese firms are catching on to women’s potential, and many are luring women as part-time factory workers, most have so far paid more attention to gray-haired males. Older people should be ideal targets for corporate recruiters everywhere. They are less likely to miss work, more polite to customers, and more loyal than their younger counterparts. In practice though, surely all they want to do is retire. The average age at which American men retire has declined from 65 in 1963 to 62 today and seems set to decline further. The few companies that are trying to halt that trend are an unconventional minority. On the Conference Board’s reckoning, 62% of American companies offer early retirement plans and only 4% offer inducements to delay retirement. That will change as American companies weigh the difficulties of recruiting new workers against the advantages of retaining old hands. Varian, a Silicon Valley company engaged in high-tech wizardry, is pioneering the way. Its phased-retirement plan permits employees who are 55 or ode to work 20-32 hours a week for as long as they and the company wish. Retired people in America are allowed to work for 1,000 hours a year without affecting their pension and health benefits. Japan’s old people are, you guessed it, workaholics: most big firms have moved their retirement ages from 55 to 60 in recent years, to please their workers as well as to relieve the labour shortage. But there is a quid pro quo: many firms have adjusted their seniority stems so that the highest wages are paid at around 45 rather than just before retirement, in order to hold down labor costs. More than 60% of Japanese men over 55 are still working, compared with 40% in America. And Japanese women lead the world in one respect, at least: at 30%, their labor participation rate over the age of 55 is industrial world’s highest. European companies are also waking up to the potential of hiring older workers. In the first six months of 1989 a British supermarket chain, Tesco, recruited around 1,500 people in their 50s and 60s with a "Life Begins at 55" campaign. At a recent conference in West Germany on the country’s graying society, sponsored by BDI, the employers’ confederation, two-thirds of the companies said they employed old-age pensioners part-time, and 75% said they expect to lure someone over 50 in the next year. With the youngest pensionable age in Europe, Germany has a huge reservoir of trained labor. All the signs are that it will need it.From the passage, we can infer that what will cause the decrease in the number of younger people in the workforce in European companies in the 1990s is______.

A.increasing life expectancies as a result of better health care
B.fewer births as a result of increasing use of birth control methods
C.a large number of young people lacking basic job skills
D.young people’s lack of interest in working
问答题

Read the following passage and then compeleted the sentences that follow by filling in the blanks with appropriate information from the text. You may have to use words that summarize the meaning of some portions of the text or spell the word with the initial letter given.(15 points) However, plays change their meaning over time. The elements that modern audiences find most disturbing in The Merchant of Venice would probably not have bothered the average Elizabethan theatergoer, while conversely, Elizabethans would have been aware of social and religious nuances that may be lost on us. Particularly troubling to modern critics is Shylock’s enforced conversion: to the modern sensibility it’s difficult to reconcile Portia’s fine words about charity with the court’s subsequent denial of the Jew’s right to the religion that is the very core of his ethnic identity. This is unlikely to have bothered Elizabethan theatergoers. Compared with the fate that was meted out to Catholic heretics like Edmund Campion, Shylock’s sentence is lenient. Moreover, conversion of the Jews to Christianity was such a central, and proverbial, part of sixteenth-century apocalyptic that it’s unlikely that an Elizabethan audience would have regarded Shylock’s sentence as unreasonable. After all, hadn’t St. Paul himself said that all Israel shall be saved(Rom. 31:26), which the Geneva Bible glossed as meaning that Christians have a duty to work for the conversion of the Jews by spreading the gospel and "the good tidings of salvation which they preached" Elizabethan exegetes believed that conversion of the Jews was the last stage in the grand historical plan outlined in Daniel’s interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream(Daniel 2:31—44.6). The surprising thing about The Merchant of Venice is not that Shakespeare could have written a play that seems to give such free expression to anti-Semitic prejudice, but that in an age when dramatists and their audiences had few inhibitions about such matters, it asks us to question that prejudice. Despite Portia’s flagrant deception of a court of law, most Elizabethan theatergoers would probably have agreed that by the end of Act IV mercy had been shown and justice done; Shylock’s conversion was clearly a matte of being cruel only to be kind. However, that’s not to say that Shylock would have been an uncontroversial figure for a contemporary audience. Though he is portrayed as a Jew, his values seem almost indistinguishable from those of a puritan: he is thrifty and self-righteous("What judgment shall I dread, doing no wrong" - IV. I. 88); he hates music, masquing and revelry; his house is "sober"(n. v. 36); he places great importance on his family(unlike his wifeless, "prodigal" adversary); and his idea of justice is based on the old lex talionis. Jews may not have been a pressing social issue in Elizabethan England but puritans certainly were... In The Merchant of Venice Shakespeare was more circumspect than he was in the two later plays, and used a politically uncontroversial hate-figure to stand for the puritan sensibility. The link was not entirely arbitrary. As a way of confirming their status as God’s chosen people, some fundamentalist puritans actually referred to themselves as Israelites.... The parallel between puritans and Jew was sufficiently familiar to be made a topic of anti-puritan satire.The author believes that Portia has blatantly______(1 word)the court of law.

答案: 正确答案:deceived
问答题

Read the following passage and then answer the questions either by writing briefly or completing the gaps in the sentences.(15 points) The survival of traditional elements in novel and emerging value systems is unavoidable and difficult to control when the assimilation of the old into the new actually occurs. Hence, it would be unfair to attribute the absence of a carefully formulated theory of human excellence suitable to the cultural climate of contemporary man exclusive to the undetected religious background of the defenders of recent humanism. The reluctance to come to grips with the problems which the quest for excellence poses has its roots partly in the modern interpretations of the place of the scientific method in ethics, and partly in the current views about human nature. The former points to the demand to keep ethical generalizations as open and provisional in character as scientific hypotheses are, with the obvious merit of securing for ethics freedom from dogmatism and preserving in its conclusions the pluralistic and open-textured qualities of experience. The latter has permitted ethical theory to bypass thorny issues that attend the systematic effort to base substantive considerations and definite valuational prescriptions on a theory of man supported by rigorous scientific evidence. The consensus among behavioral scientists has been for quite some time that the nature of man is to have no nature. In the face of such formidable obstacles from the sciences of man, the science of the good life was never launched. Given the widespread prevalence of this fluid conception of human nature, it is easy to see why efforts to formulate a system of humanistic excellences within the scope of substantive ethics have been by and large inhibited. It is common knowledge that professional philosophers have cautiously avoided even mentioning the existence of such an enterprise in their list of endeavors. The only course left open to the daring advocates of nonreligious substantive ethics was mainly one which led to a soft and scientifically inoffensive "open-textured" humanism of fulfillments. The philosophy on which the view rested was as derivative as the utilitarian and pragmatic features which constituted its basic appeal. What has been missing all along was the bold effort needed to give the new humanism the respectable objectivity that only a science of the good life could provide. But in the absence of a firm foundation the gospel of plural fulfillments is subject to the same treatment given to loud our critical faculties. One thing is clear: the new humanism has demonstrated its power to persuade. What the time calls for is more wisdom. It is precisely on this point that the humanism of classical Greece has demonstrated its relevance, but not every humanist is prepared to agree with me on this issue.What is a taboo subject among professional philosophers

答案: 正确答案:Efforts to formulate a system of humanistic excellences...
问答题

Read the following passage and then answer the questions either by writing briefly or completing the gaps in the sentences.(15 points) The survival of traditional elements in novel and emerging value systems is unavoidable and difficult to control when the assimilation of the old into the new actually occurs. Hence, it would be unfair to attribute the absence of a carefully formulated theory of human excellence suitable to the cultural climate of contemporary man exclusive to the undetected religious background of the defenders of recent humanism. The reluctance to come to grips with the problems which the quest for excellence poses has its roots partly in the modern interpretations of the place of the scientific method in ethics, and partly in the current views about human nature. The former points to the demand to keep ethical generalizations as open and provisional in character as scientific hypotheses are, with the obvious merit of securing for ethics freedom from dogmatism and preserving in its conclusions the pluralistic and open-textured qualities of experience. The latter has permitted ethical theory to bypass thorny issues that attend the systematic effort to base substantive considerations and definite valuational prescriptions on a theory of man supported by rigorous scientific evidence. The consensus among behavioral scientists has been for quite some time that the nature of man is to have no nature. In the face of such formidable obstacles from the sciences of man, the science of the good life was never launched. Given the widespread prevalence of this fluid conception of human nature, it is easy to see why efforts to formulate a system of humanistic excellences within the scope of substantive ethics have been by and large inhibited. It is common knowledge that professional philosophers have cautiously avoided even mentioning the existence of such an enterprise in their list of endeavors. The only course left open to the daring advocates of nonreligious substantive ethics was mainly one which led to a soft and scientifically inoffensive "open-textured" humanism of fulfillments. The philosophy on which the view rested was as derivative as the utilitarian and pragmatic features which constituted its basic appeal. What has been missing all along was the bold effort needed to give the new humanism the respectable objectivity that only a science of the good life could provide. But in the absence of a firm foundation the gospel of plural fulfillments is subject to the same treatment given to loud our critical faculties. One thing is clear: the new humanism has demonstrated its power to persuade. What the time calls for is more wisdom. It is precisely on this point that the humanism of classical Greece has demonstrated its relevance, but not every humanist is prepared to agree with me on this issue.The gospel of plural fulfillments shares the same fate as loud manifestos and protean promises because the former has no______.(2 words)

答案: 正确答案:firm foundation
问答题

Read the following passage and then compeleted the sentences that follow by filling in the blanks with appropriate information from the text. You may have to use words that summarize the meaning of some portions of the text or spell the word with the initial letter given.(15 points) However, plays change their meaning over time. The elements that modern audiences find most disturbing in The Merchant of Venice would probably not have bothered the average Elizabethan theatergoer, while conversely, Elizabethans would have been aware of social and religious nuances that may be lost on us. Particularly troubling to modern critics is Shylock’s enforced conversion: to the modern sensibility it’s difficult to reconcile Portia’s fine words about charity with the court’s subsequent denial of the Jew’s right to the religion that is the very core of his ethnic identity. This is unlikely to have bothered Elizabethan theatergoers. Compared with the fate that was meted out to Catholic heretics like Edmund Campion, Shylock’s sentence is lenient. Moreover, conversion of the Jews to Christianity was such a central, and proverbial, part of sixteenth-century apocalyptic that it’s unlikely that an Elizabethan audience would have regarded Shylock’s sentence as unreasonable. After all, hadn’t St. Paul himself said that all Israel shall be saved(Rom. 31:26), which the Geneva Bible glossed as meaning that Christians have a duty to work for the conversion of the Jews by spreading the gospel and "the good tidings of salvation which they preached" Elizabethan exegetes believed that conversion of the Jews was the last stage in the grand historical plan outlined in Daniel’s interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream(Daniel 2:31—44.6). The surprising thing about The Merchant of Venice is not that Shakespeare could have written a play that seems to give such free expression to anti-Semitic prejudice, but that in an age when dramatists and their audiences had few inhibitions about such matters, it asks us to question that prejudice. Despite Portia’s flagrant deception of a court of law, most Elizabethan theatergoers would probably have agreed that by the end of Act IV mercy had been shown and justice done; Shylock’s conversion was clearly a matte of being cruel only to be kind. However, that’s not to say that Shylock would have been an uncontroversial figure for a contemporary audience. Though he is portrayed as a Jew, his values seem almost indistinguishable from those of a puritan: he is thrifty and self-righteous("What judgment shall I dread, doing no wrong" - IV. I. 88); he hates music, masquing and revelry; his house is "sober"(n. v. 36); he places great importance on his family(unlike his wifeless, "prodigal" adversary); and his idea of justice is based on the old lex talionis. Jews may not have been a pressing social issue in Elizabethan England but puritans certainly were... In The Merchant of Venice Shakespeare was more circumspect than he was in the two later plays, and used a politically uncontroversial hate-figure to stand for the puritan sensibility. The link was not entirely arbitrary. As a way of confirming their status as God’s chosen people, some fundamentalist puritans actually referred to themselves as Israelites.... The parallel between puritans and Jew was sufficiently familiar to be made a topic of anti-puritan satire.The second paragraph seems to point out the______(1 word)of moral principles between Shylock and the Puritans.

答案: 正确答案:link/parallel
问答题

Read the following passage and then answer the questions either by writing briefly or completing the gaps in the sentences.(15 points) The survival of traditional elements in novel and emerging value systems is unavoidable and difficult to control when the assimilation of the old into the new actually occurs. Hence, it would be unfair to attribute the absence of a carefully formulated theory of human excellence suitable to the cultural climate of contemporary man exclusive to the undetected religious background of the defenders of recent humanism. The reluctance to come to grips with the problems which the quest for excellence poses has its roots partly in the modern interpretations of the place of the scientific method in ethics, and partly in the current views about human nature. The former points to the demand to keep ethical generalizations as open and provisional in character as scientific hypotheses are, with the obvious merit of securing for ethics freedom from dogmatism and preserving in its conclusions the pluralistic and open-textured qualities of experience. The latter has permitted ethical theory to bypass thorny issues that attend the systematic effort to base substantive considerations and definite valuational prescriptions on a theory of man supported by rigorous scientific evidence. The consensus among behavioral scientists has been for quite some time that the nature of man is to have no nature. In the face of such formidable obstacles from the sciences of man, the science of the good life was never launched. Given the widespread prevalence of this fluid conception of human nature, it is easy to see why efforts to formulate a system of humanistic excellences within the scope of substantive ethics have been by and large inhibited. It is common knowledge that professional philosophers have cautiously avoided even mentioning the existence of such an enterprise in their list of endeavors. The only course left open to the daring advocates of nonreligious substantive ethics was mainly one which led to a soft and scientifically inoffensive "open-textured" humanism of fulfillments. The philosophy on which the view rested was as derivative as the utilitarian and pragmatic features which constituted its basic appeal. What has been missing all along was the bold effort needed to give the new humanism the respectable objectivity that only a science of the good life could provide. But in the absence of a firm foundation the gospel of plural fulfillments is subject to the same treatment given to loud our critical faculties. One thing is clear: the new humanism has demonstrated its power to persuade. What the time calls for is more wisdom. It is precisely on this point that the humanism of classical Greece has demonstrated its relevance, but not every humanist is prepared to agree with me on this issue.It can be inferred that the gospel of plural fulfillments cannot stand the scrutiny of man’s______.(2 words)

答案: 正确答案:critical faculties
问答题

Read the following passage and then compeleted the sentences that follow by filling in the blanks with appropriate information from the text. You may have to use words that summarize the meaning of some portions of the text or spell the word with the initial letter given.(15 points) However, plays change their meaning over time. The elements that modern audiences find most disturbing in The Merchant of Venice would probably not have bothered the average Elizabethan theatergoer, while conversely, Elizabethans would have been aware of social and religious nuances that may be lost on us. Particularly troubling to modern critics is Shylock’s enforced conversion: to the modern sensibility it’s difficult to reconcile Portia’s fine words about charity with the court’s subsequent denial of the Jew’s right to the religion that is the very core of his ethnic identity. This is unlikely to have bothered Elizabethan theatergoers. Compared with the fate that was meted out to Catholic heretics like Edmund Campion, Shylock’s sentence is lenient. Moreover, conversion of the Jews to Christianity was such a central, and proverbial, part of sixteenth-century apocalyptic that it’s unlikely that an Elizabethan audience would have regarded Shylock’s sentence as unreasonable. After all, hadn’t St. Paul himself said that all Israel shall be saved(Rom. 31:26), which the Geneva Bible glossed as meaning that Christians have a duty to work for the conversion of the Jews by spreading the gospel and "the good tidings of salvation which they preached" Elizabethan exegetes believed that conversion of the Jews was the last stage in the grand historical plan outlined in Daniel’s interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream(Daniel 2:31—44.6). The surprising thing about The Merchant of Venice is not that Shakespeare could have written a play that seems to give such free expression to anti-Semitic prejudice, but that in an age when dramatists and their audiences had few inhibitions about such matters, it asks us to question that prejudice. Despite Portia’s flagrant deception of a court of law, most Elizabethan theatergoers would probably have agreed that by the end of Act IV mercy had been shown and justice done; Shylock’s conversion was clearly a matte of being cruel only to be kind. However, that’s not to say that Shylock would have been an uncontroversial figure for a contemporary audience. Though he is portrayed as a Jew, his values seem almost indistinguishable from those of a puritan: he is thrifty and self-righteous("What judgment shall I dread, doing no wrong" - IV. I. 88); he hates music, masquing and revelry; his house is "sober"(n. v. 36); he places great importance on his family(unlike his wifeless, "prodigal" adversary); and his idea of justice is based on the old lex talionis. Jews may not have been a pressing social issue in Elizabethan England but puritans certainly were... In The Merchant of Venice Shakespeare was more circumspect than he was in the two later plays, and used a politically uncontroversial hate-figure to stand for the puritan sensibility. The link was not entirely arbitrary. As a way of confirming their status as God’s chosen people, some fundamentalist puritans actually referred to themselves as Israelites.... The parallel between puritans and Jew was sufficiently familiar to be made a topic of anti-puritan satire.The author implies that Shakespeare used Shylock as a safe object of ridicule to represent the ______(2 words)

答案: 正确答案:puritan sensibility
问答题

Read the following passage and then answer the questions either by writing briefly or completing the gaps in the sentences.(15 points) The survival of traditional elements in novel and emerging value systems is unavoidable and difficult to control when the assimilation of the old into the new actually occurs. Hence, it would be unfair to attribute the absence of a carefully formulated theory of human excellence suitable to the cultural climate of contemporary man exclusive to the undetected religious background of the defenders of recent humanism. The reluctance to come to grips with the problems which the quest for excellence poses has its roots partly in the modern interpretations of the place of the scientific method in ethics, and partly in the current views about human nature. The former points to the demand to keep ethical generalizations as open and provisional in character as scientific hypotheses are, with the obvious merit of securing for ethics freedom from dogmatism and preserving in its conclusions the pluralistic and open-textured qualities of experience. The latter has permitted ethical theory to bypass thorny issues that attend the systematic effort to base substantive considerations and definite valuational prescriptions on a theory of man supported by rigorous scientific evidence. The consensus among behavioral scientists has been for quite some time that the nature of man is to have no nature. In the face of such formidable obstacles from the sciences of man, the science of the good life was never launched. Given the widespread prevalence of this fluid conception of human nature, it is easy to see why efforts to formulate a system of humanistic excellences within the scope of substantive ethics have been by and large inhibited. It is common knowledge that professional philosophers have cautiously avoided even mentioning the existence of such an enterprise in their list of endeavors. The only course left open to the daring advocates of nonreligious substantive ethics was mainly one which led to a soft and scientifically inoffensive "open-textured" humanism of fulfillments. The philosophy on which the view rested was as derivative as the utilitarian and pragmatic features which constituted its basic appeal. What has been missing all along was the bold effort needed to give the new humanism the respectable objectivity that only a science of the good life could provide. But in the absence of a firm foundation the gospel of plural fulfillments is subject to the same treatment given to loud our critical faculties. One thing is clear: the new humanism has demonstrated its power to persuade. What the time calls for is more wisdom. It is precisely on this point that the humanism of classical Greece has demonstrated its relevance, but not every humanist is prepared to agree with me on this issue.The author expects differences of opinion from fellow humanists regarding the question of whether classical Greece has any______(1 word)to our time’s particular need.

答案: 正确答案:relevance
问答题

Read the following passage and then compeleted the sentences that follow by filling in the blanks with appropriate information from the text. You may have to use words that summarize the meaning of some portions of the text or spell the word with the initial letter given.(15 points) However, plays change their meaning over time. The elements that modern audiences find most disturbing in The Merchant of Venice would probably not have bothered the average Elizabethan theatergoer, while conversely, Elizabethans would have been aware of social and religious nuances that may be lost on us. Particularly troubling to modern critics is Shylock’s enforced conversion: to the modern sensibility it’s difficult to reconcile Portia’s fine words about charity with the court’s subsequent denial of the Jew’s right to the religion that is the very core of his ethnic identity. This is unlikely to have bothered Elizabethan theatergoers. Compared with the fate that was meted out to Catholic heretics like Edmund Campion, Shylock’s sentence is lenient. Moreover, conversion of the Jews to Christianity was such a central, and proverbial, part of sixteenth-century apocalyptic that it’s unlikely that an Elizabethan audience would have regarded Shylock’s sentence as unreasonable. After all, hadn’t St. Paul himself said that all Israel shall be saved(Rom. 31:26), which the Geneva Bible glossed as meaning that Christians have a duty to work for the conversion of the Jews by spreading the gospel and "the good tidings of salvation which they preached" Elizabethan exegetes believed that conversion of the Jews was the last stage in the grand historical plan outlined in Daniel’s interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream(Daniel 2:31—44.6). The surprising thing about The Merchant of Venice is not that Shakespeare could have written a play that seems to give such free expression to anti-Semitic prejudice, but that in an age when dramatists and their audiences had few inhibitions about such matters, it asks us to question that prejudice. Despite Portia’s flagrant deception of a court of law, most Elizabethan theatergoers would probably have agreed that by the end of Act IV mercy had been shown and justice done; Shylock’s conversion was clearly a matte of being cruel only to be kind. However, that’s not to say that Shylock would have been an uncontroversial figure for a contemporary audience. Though he is portrayed as a Jew, his values seem almost indistinguishable from those of a puritan: he is thrifty and self-righteous("What judgment shall I dread, doing no wrong" - IV. I. 88); he hates music, masquing and revelry; his house is "sober"(n. v. 36); he places great importance on his family(unlike his wifeless, "prodigal" adversary); and his idea of justice is based on the old lex talionis. Jews may not have been a pressing social issue in Elizabethan England but puritans certainly were... In The Merchant of Venice Shakespeare was more circumspect than he was in the two later plays, and used a politically uncontroversial hate-figure to stand for the puritan sensibility. The link was not entirely arbitrary. As a way of confirming their status as God’s chosen people, some fundamentalist puritans actually referred to themselves as Israelites.... The parallel between puritans and Jew was sufficiently familiar to be made a topic of anti-puritan satire.Summarize the main idea of this passage in about 30 words.

答案: 正确答案:The meaning of a play varies over time because of the c...
微信扫码免费搜题